1	Chapter 1 Introduction to Forensic Science and the Law “In school, every period ends with a bell. Every sentence ends with a period. Every crime ends with a sentence.” —Stephen Wright, comedian
2	Introduction How a crime lab works The growth and development of forensic science through history Federal rules of evidence, including the Frye standard and the Daubert ruling Basic types of law in the criminal justice system Students will be able to: Describe how the scientific method is used to solve forensic problems Describe different jobs done by forensic scientists and the experts they consult.
3	Forensic Science The study and application of science to matters of law. Includes the business of providing timely, accurate, and thorough information to all levels of decision makers in our criminal justice system. The word forensic is derived from the Latin “forensis” meaning forum, a public place where, in Roman times, senators and others debated and held judicial proceedings.
4	Criminalistics vs Criminology Criminalistics the scientific examination of physical evidence for legal purposes. Criminology includes the psychological angle, studying the crime scene for motive, traits, and behavior that will help to interpret the evidence
5	Crime Lab—Basic Services Physical Science Unit Chemistry Physics Geology Biology Unit Firearms Unit Document Examination Unit Photography Unit
6	Crime Lab—Optional Services Toxicology Unit Latent Fingerprint Unit Polygraph Unit Voiceprint Analysis Unit Evidence Collection Unit
7	Other Forensic Science Services Forensic Pathology Forensic Anthropology Forensic Entomology Forensic Psychiatry Forensic Odontology Forensic Engineering Cybertechnology
8	Major Crime Laboratories FBI DEA ATF U.S. Postal Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
9	Crime Lab History First police crime lab in the world was established in France in 1910 by Edmond Locard First police crime lab in the U.S. opened in 1923 in Los Angeles The Scientific Crime Detection Lab was founded in Evanston, Illinois in 1929 The first FBI crime lab opened in 1932
10	Major Developments in Forensic Science History 700s AD—Chinese used fingerprints to establish identity of documents and clay sculptures ~1000—Roman courts determined that bloody palm prints were used to frame a man in his brother’s murder 1149—King Richard of England introduced the idea of the coroner to investigate questionable death 1200s—A murder in China is solved when flies were attracted to invisible blood residue on a sword of a man in the community 1598—Fidelus was first to practice forensic medicine in Italy 1670—Anton Van Leeuwenhoek constructed the first high-powered microscope 1776—Paul Revere identified the body of General Joseph Warren based on the false teeth he had made for him 1784—John Toms convicted of murder on basis of torn edge of wad of paper in pistol matching a piece of paper in his pocket
11	Major Developments in Forensic Science History 1859—Gustav Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen developed the science of spectroscopy. 1864—Crime scene photography developed 1879—Alphonse Bertillon developed a system to identify people using particular body measurements 1896—Edward Henry developed first classification system for fingerprint identification 1900—Karl Landsteiner identified human blood groups 1904—Edmond Locard formulated his famous principle, “Every contact leaves a trace.” 1922—Francis Aston developed the mass spectrometer. 1959—James Watson and Francis Crick discover the DNA double helix 1977—AFIS developed by FBI, fully automated in 1996 1984—Jeffreys developed and used first DNA tests to be applied to a criminal case
12	People of Historical Significance Edmond Locard (1877-1966) French professor Considered the father of criminalistics Built the world’s first forensic laboratory in France in 1910 Locard Exchange Principle Whenever two objects come into contact with each other, traces of each are exchanged.
13	Crime Scene Team A group of professional investigators, each trained in a variety of special disciplines. Team Members First Police Officer on the scene Medics (if necessary) Investigator(s) Medical Examiner or Representative (if necessary) Photographer and/or Field Evidence Technician Lab Experts pathologist serologist DNA expert toxicologist forensic odontologist forensic anthropologist forensic psychologist forensic entomologist firearm examiner bomb and arson expert document and handwriting experts fingerprint expert
14	Scientific Method (as it pertains to criminalistics) Observe a problem or questioned evidence and collect objective data. Consider a hypothesis or possible solution. Examine, test, and then analyze the evidence. Determine the significance of the evidence. Formulate a theory based on evaluation of the significance of the evidence
15	Complex Reasoning Skills Necessary to Work Through and Solve Crimes: Deductive and Inductive Reasoning Classifying Comparing and Contrasting Problem Solving Analyzing Perspectives Constructing Support Error Analysis
16	Laws that Pertain to the U.S. Criminal Justice System The U.S. Constitution Statutory Law Common Law or Case Law Civil Law Criminal Law Equity Law Administrative Law
17	The Bill of Rights Gives individuals the right: To be presumed innocent until proven guilty Not to be searched unreasonably Not to be arrested without probable cause Against unreasonable seizure of personal property Against self-incrimination To fair questioning by police To protection from physical harm throughout the justice process To an attorney To trial by jury To know any charges against oneself To cross-examine prosecution witnesses To speak and present witnesses Not to be tried again for the same crime Against cruel and unusual punishment To due process To a speedy trial Against excessive bail Against excessive fines To be treated the same as others, regardless of race, gender, religious preference, country of origin, and other personal attributes
18	Miranda v Arizona In 1963, Ernesto Miranda, a 23 year old mentally disturbed man, was accused of kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman in Phoenix, Arizona. He was brought in for questioning, and confessed to the crime. He was not told that he did not have to speak or that he could have a lawyer present. At trial, Miranda's lawyer tried to get the confession thrown out, but the motion was denied. The case went to the Supreme Court in 1966. The Court ruled that the statements made to the police could not be used as evidence, since Mr. Miranda had not been advised of his rights.
19	Miranda Rights The following is a minimal Miranda warning: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at the government’s expense.
20	Types of Crimes Infraction Misdemeanor Felony
21	Federal Rules of Evidence In order for evidence to be admissible, it must be: Probative—actually prove something Material—address an issue that is relevant to the particular crime
22	Admissibility of Evidence 1923 Frye v. United States Scientific evidence is allowed into the courtroom if it is generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. The Frye standard does not offer any guidance on reliability. The evidence is presented in the trial and the jury decides if it can be used. 1993 Daubert v. Dow Admissibility is determined by: Whether the theory or technique can be tested Whether the science has been offered for peer review Whether the rate of error is acceptable Whether the method at issue enjoys widespread acceptance. Whether the opinion is relevant to the issue The judge decides if the evidence can be entered into the trial.
23	Facets of Guilt Try to prove: Means—person had the ability to do the crime Motive—person had a reason to do the crime (not necessary to prove in a court of law) Opportunity—person can be placed at the crime
24	"“If the Law has..." “If the Law has made you a witness, remain a man (woman) of science. You have no victim to avenge, no guilty or innocent person to ruin or save. You must bear testimony within the limits of science.” —P.C.H. Brouardel